MAMA SALONE ~ Lioness of the West Coast

Pip: MAMA SALONE ~ Lioness of the West Coast has been following a paper trail from Freetown to Venice, and the trail just delivered its final answer — which turns out to be a question the Sierra Leonean government still has not answered.

Mara: Mama Salone Blog's investigative series closes today with documents obtained directly from La Biennale under Italian transparency law — records that show who signed what, in what order, and under whose instruction.

Pip: Let's get into the appointment that may not have been an appointment at all.

Who Appointed the Commissioner — and Did She Appoint Herself?

Mara: The central tension of this final installment is procedural and constitutional at once: La Biennale's rules require a government minister to appoint the Commissioner, and the Commissioner must flow from that authority — not the other way around.

Pip: The released correspondence shows the first letter to La Biennale came not from any ministry but from Office of the President letterhead, signed by Tony Morgan, Head of Strategy and Communication at State House. His opening line sets the tone: "I am under instruction by the First Lady H.E Dr. Fatima Maada Bio."

Mara: So the pavilion team — Commissioner, Deputy, curators, general organizers — was proposed before any government decision appears in the record. La Biennale's president wrote back reminding Morgan that only a competent governmental authority could sign, and that deputy commissioners would not be accepted.

Pip: Then the Foreign Minister's letter arrived. A minister signing is exactly what the procedure requires. Except his first sentence reads: "I am acting under the instruction of Her Excellency Dr. Fatima Maada Bio."

Mara: The post lays out what that inversion means in practice. The authority that was supposed to appoint the Commissioner is shown taking direction from the person to be appointed. As the piece states plainly: "a process in which the appointee instructs the appointer is not an appointment. It is ratification."

Pip: And ratification of a decision nobody on paper seems to have made — no Cabinet resolution, no stand-alone appointment instrument, no budget appears in anything La Biennale released.

Mara: The minister's letter also tracks Morgan's earlier draft almost word for word, and the only copy recipient listed is the Chief of Staff of the Office of the First Lady. The Ministry of Tourism and Cultural Affairs, the body Part I of this series identified as built for exactly this work, does not sign, is not copied, and is not mentioned anywhere.

Pip: The later operational records are just as pointed. Paolo Mozzo submitted catalogue texts in January 2026 and told La Biennale in February that "we have chosen" the pavilion's press office. The press agent then described Mozzo to Biennale staff as "il responsabile del Padiglione Sierra Leone" — the person in charge. No ministry, no Commissioner appears in any of those exchanges.

Mara: The piece also flags a catalogue discrepancy worth noting: the English text says the pavilion is "Sponsored by ECOWAS," while the Italian says patrocinato — patronage. Sponsorship and patronage are legally different, and the post asks directly who selected the exhibiting artists and whether any gallery or exhibitor paid a fee, which the procedures prohibit.

Pip: The series closes by naming exactly which offices owe answers — Foreign Affairs, State House, Tourism, the Office of the First Lady — and urging Parliament, the press, and the Anti-Corruption Commission to put those questions in writing under Sierra Leone's Right to Access Information Act.

Mara: The final framing is unambiguous: "The plan came first. The government's signature came second." The pavilion carried the Republic's name. The Republic is owed an account.

Pip: Six parts, one question — and the documents answer it by showing what's missing where authority should be.

Mara: Accountability gaps at the level of a national pavilion tend to point toward larger questions about how public power moves in Sierra Leone. Those questions aren't going away.

Pip: Sierra Leone's first-ever National Pavilion at the Venice Biennale — historic moment, art, culture, commerce, and apparently a Tanzanian businessman with a title that needs some unpacking.

Mara: Mama Salone Blog has been running a detailed investigative series on exactly that — who assembled the pavilion, under whose authority, and what relationships existed before Venice. Today we're following the money, the titles, and the network.

Pip: Let's start with Kevin Nyerere, Honorary President, and the trail that leads back well before anyone set foot in Venice.

—

Kevin Nyerere and the Network Behind Sierra Leone's Venice Pavilion

Mara: The central tension here is one of authority and disclosure — a Tanzanian businessman holds a prominent title at Sierra Leone's national pavilion, and the public record does not explain how that appointment happened or who approved it.

Pip: The official La Biennale page lists the pavilion's leadership plainly, and the Sierra Leone Pavilion website goes a step further, describing him as "S.A.S. Prince Kevin Nyerere, Honorary President, AMAA / Business Associate."

Mara: That description raises immediate questions the post lays out directly: what is AMAA, what does "Business Associate" mean in this context, and what governmental authority, if any, approved that appointment?

Pip: And Nyerere's background matters here — Forbes Italia profiled him in 2020 as a business intermediary connecting European companies with African governments and investment opportunities, operating through Jasiri Ltd and Kevin Nyerere Holdings. That's not a curatorial resume.

Mara: The post is careful to note that nationality is not the issue. Foreign professionals can legitimately participate in national pavilions. The question is function and appointment — especially because Tony Morgan was simultaneously speaking about investors, commercial infrastructure, and logistics hubs.

Pip: So a pavilion framed partly around commerce has an Honorary President whose documented expertise is connecting European businesses to African markets. The roles rhyme a little too neatly for the appointment to go unexplained.

Mara: And then comes the discovery that reframes everything. In December 2024 — more than a year before Venice — AYV Media Empire reported on a water technology project in Zanzibar, describing it as "Dr. Tony Morgan's partnership with Kevin Nyerere Holdings."

Pip: Pre-existing business associates. That shifts the question from "who is Kevin Nyerere" to "how did a pre-existing business associate of Tony Morgan become Honorary President of Sierra Leone's National Pavilion."

Mara: The Zanzibar reporting added another layer: the initiative was explicitly linked to First Lady Fatima Bio's advocacy on water and sanitation. So by December 2024, the public record had already connected all three names — Morgan, Nyerere, and Bio — around a shared African development project.

Pip: The post is precise about what this does and doesn't establish. It's a documented chronology and a network of pre-existing relationships. The appointment process itself, and the institutional authority behind it, remain unanswered.

Mara: There's still the Italian curatorial and organizational infrastructure, the question of financing, and sixteen exhibiting artists — only four of them Sierra Leonean — all of which the series flags as the territory Part V will examine.

Pip: The network behind the pavilion runs deeper than three people — and the financial accountability questions are still open.

—

Mara: Authority, disclosure, and pre-existing relationships — the investigation keeps returning to the same gap between the public presentation and the documented record.

Pip: Next stop, apparently, is Italy and the money. Which is either where the answers are or where the questions get more complicated.